ILTIMOS BO’LING!

XATNI OCHISH
JAHON SOG‘LIQNI SAQLASH TASHKILOTI

Qonun ustuvorligini, tenglikni va qonun ustuvorligini ta’minlashga chaqirish
bo’yicha JSST qonun ijodkorligi jarayonlarida tegishli ko’rib chiqish jarayoni
pandemiyaga tayyorgarlik va javob choralari

2024-yil, aprel

OCHIQ XATNI O‘QING VA IMZO BO‘LING
SIZ UCHUN MUHIM VA ZO’HR!
O’QING NEGA:

Joriy yilning may oyi oxirida Jahon sog‘liqni saqlash tashkilotining (JSST) 194 ta a’zo davlati birgalikda xalqaro sog‘liqni saqlash va davlatlarning o‘zaro munosabatlarini o‘zgartirishga qaratilgan ikkita hujjatni qabul qilish bo‘yicha ovoz berishlari rejalashtirilgan. JSST favqulodda holat e’lon qildi. Ushbu loyihalar, Pandemiya to’g’risidagi bitim va Xalqaro sog’liqni saqlash qoidalariga (IHR) qo’shimchalar , qonuniy kuchga ega bo’lishi va davlatlar va JSST o’rtasidagi munosabatlarni tartibga solish uchun mo’ljallangan.

Ular salomatlik, iqtisodiy va inson huquqlariga jiddiy ta’sir ko’rsatsa ham, ular turli qo’mitalar tomonidan mo’ljallangan ovoz berishdan ikki oydan kamroq vaqt oldin muzokaralar olib bormoqda. Ular pandemiya xavfini yumshatishning tez ortib borayotgan dolzarbligi sababli g’ayrioddiy shoshqaloqlik bilan ishlab chiqilgan.

Ushbu shoshilinchlik JSST va boshqa idoralar tayangan ma’lumotlar va iqtiboslar bilan zid ekanligi ko’rsatilgan bo’lsa-da, shoshilinchlik saqlanib qolmoqda. Natijada, ma’lum bir ko’rib chiqish vaqtini talab qiluvchi normalar chetga surildi, bu muqarrar ravishda kam resurslarga ega bo’lgan davlatlarga ovoz berishdan oldin o’z aholisi uchun oqibatlarini to’liq baholashga imkon bermaslik orqali kelishuvlardagi tenglikni buzadi.

Bu qonuniy kuchga ega bo’lgan xalqaro shartnoma yoki shartnomani ishlab chiqishning o’ta yomon va xavfli usuli. Yaqinda e’lon qilingan ommaviy maktubda noto’g’ri tavsiya qilinganidek, turli xil huquqiy rejimlarning chalkash to’plamini, ustun hokimiyatni va raqobatdosh global aktyorlarning ko’payishini tezda institutsionalizatsiya qilish o’rniga, izchil huquqiy pandemiya paketini ishlab chiqish uchun sekinlashish vaqti keldi.

Quyidagi Ochiq maktub JSST va a’zo davlatlarni qonun ustuvorligi va adolatni ta’minlash uchun Xalqaro sog’liqni saqlash qoidalariga va 77-JSSTda yangi Pandemiya kelishuviga tuzatishlar qabul qilish muddatini uzaytirishga chaqiradi.

Mualliflar: David Bell, Silvia Behrendt, Amrei Myuller, Thi Thuy Van Dinh va boshqalar

Openletter WHO - PLEASE SIGN THIS OPEN LETTER

Dear SpeakOut! user

OPEN LETTER
 
<p>to the World Health Organization and all negotiating Member States,
the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health
Regulations and the International Negotiating Body</p>

April 2024

Dear Dr. Tedros, Director-General of the World Health Organization
Dear Co-Chairs Dr. Asiri and Dr. Bloomfield of the WGIHR,
Dear Co-Chairs Dr. Matsoso and Mr. Driece of the INB,
Dear national delegates of the respective working groups,

Both the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (WGIHR) and the International Negotiating Body (INB) negotiating the Pandemic Agreement were mandated to deliver the definite legal wording of the targeted amendments of the International Health Regulations (IHR) as well as of the Pandemic Agreement to the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA), taking place at the end of May 2024. These processes havebeen ushered through in haste to “capture a post-COVID-19 moment”, despite evidence that there is limited risk of another pandemic occurring in the short-to-medium term. In other words, there is time to get these measures right.

Yet, due to the speed in which these processes have occurred both negotiation processes are threatening to deliver illegitimate policies by violating the very objectives and principles of equity and deliberation which are proclaimed to be safeguarded through the pandemic law-making process under the auspices of WHO. Consequently, the politically set deadline for adoption at the 77th WHA must be lifted and extended to safeguard the lawfulness and transparency of the processes, clarifying the relationship between the amended IHR and the new Pandemic Agreement, and ensuring an equitable and democratic outcome.

The WGIHR’s non-compliance with the IHR excludes a lawful adoption at the 77th WHA

The adoption of any amendments of the IHR at the 77th WHA can no longer be achieved in alawful manner. Currently, the WGIHR keeps negotiating the draft amendments, with the aim to finalise the package of proposed amendments during its 8th meeting scheduled for the 22nd

– 26th April that is then to be presented to the 77th WHA. This modus operandi is unlawful. It violates Article 55(2) IHR which sets out the procedure to be followed for amending the IHR:

‘The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.’

The deadline for the Director-General to circulate the package of proposed amendments to the IHR to States Parties lawfully in advance of the 77th WHA has passed on the 27th January 2024.

As of yet, the Director-General has not communicated any amendments to the States. The IHR is a multilateral treatyi binding both States that ratified the IHR and the WHO, including subdivisions ii of the WHA like the WGIHR. They must abide by the binding procedural rules of Article 55(2) IHR and cannot suspend these rules arbitrarily.

During the public webcast of 2nd October 2023,iii the issue was referred to WHO’s Principal Legal Officer, Dr Steven Solomon, who explained that since the draft amendments come from a subdivision of the WHA, the 4-month requirement of Article 55(2) did not apply. However, his opinion disregards the fact that Article 55(2) does not make any distinction as to which State, group of States or specific part of the WHA propose the amendments. Moreover, in the Terms of Reference of the IHR Review Committee (2022)iv the timeline of the WGIHR’s work was set at ‘January 2024: WGIHR submits their final package of proposed amendments to the Director-General who will communicate them to all States Parties in accordance with Article 55(2) for the consideration of the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly.’ If the WGIHR and WHO purposefully violate the IHR, the rule of law is indeed undermined, potentially entailing international responsibility for the organisation and/or individuals in charge.

Inseparable processes of IHR and new Pandemic Treaty

The available drafts of the WGIHR and INB imply that the two processes of the WGIHR and INB cannot stand independently but are inseparable from each other. Particularly, the new draft Pandemic Agreement cannot be adopted prior to revising the IHR because it needs to build upon the revised structure, material scope and institutions of the IHR (especially given wording of IHR core capacities currently in the March 7th, 2024 negotiating text of the Pandemic Agreement). Disrupting challenges like the significant overlap ratione materiae, the competences and relationships between the newly established treaty bodies, and vs Member States, as well as the long-term financial implications for the health budget, etc. – require detailed clarification prior to adoption.

Equity and democratic legitimacy

Disregarding procedural obligations under the IHR and leaving the relationship between the amended IHR and new Pandemic Agreement nebulous not only undermines the international rule of law, it also undercuts the spirit of Article 55(2) of the IHR (2005), which guarantees Member States four months lead-time to review IHR amendments to promote democratic legitimacy, procedural justice, and to better ensure equitable outcomes.

States need at least four months to thoroughly reflect on the implications of proposed amendments for their domestic constitutional legal orders and their financial capacities. They must seek political and/or parliamentary approval prior to the adoption of the respective resolutions at the WHA. This is especially germane given the unique legal status of adopted IHR amendments that will enter into force automatically unless a State Party actively opts out within a very short timeframe of 10 months.

Equity is stated by WHO to be at the heart of the pandemic preparedness and response agenda. Many low- and middle-income countries do not have representatives and experts present in Geneva during the entire parallel negotiation processes, have their representatives’ discussing matters in less familiar languages, and/or must rely on diplomatic group/regional representations. This introduces inequity to the ability to fully participate in the negotiation process within the WGIHR and the INB developing the Pandemic Agreement. Richer countries have more ability to input into drafts and greater resources to review their implications. These manifestly unfair negotiation processes are contrary to the spirit and stated intent of the entire process. Ensuring equity, transparency and fairness requires an adequate time to discuss and consider what are intended to be legally-binding agreements.

Markedly exaggerated urgency claim

Whilst some have argued that urgency in developing new pandemic management instruments is justified by a rising risk and burden of such infectious disease outbreaks, this has recently been demonstrated to be a markedly exaggerated claim.vi The evidence bases on which the WHO have relied, and partner agencies including the World Bank and G20, demonstrate that the risk of naturally-derived outbreaks is not currently increasing, and overall burden is probably declining. This suggests that current mechanisms are indeed working relatively effectively, and changes must be viewed carefully, without undue urgency, in the light of the heterogeneity of threat and competing public health priorities across WHO Member States.

Appeal not to adopt the IHR amendments or Pandemic Agreement at the 77th WHA

The two working groups are requested to follow the UN Principles and guidelines for international negotiations, UN A/RES/53/101,vii and to conduct negotiations in a spirit of good faith and ‘endeavour to maintain a constructive atmosphere during negotiations and to refrain from any conduct which might undermine the negotiations and their progress.’ A rational timeline without political pressure for results will safeguard the current law-making process from collapsing and prevent potential political abandonment, as experienced in case of the WHO Research and Development (R&D) Treaty.

One of the original reasons to initiate the amendment process of the IHR (2005) was the WHO’s express concern that States did not comply with their obligations under the IHR during the Covid-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern. With their failure to keep to the 4-months review period, the WHO and the WGIHR themselves show their open disregard for their legally binding duties under the IHR. A resolution with proposed amendments to the IHR for adoption at the 77th WHA can no longer be presented lawfully. Consequently, the Pandemic Agreement also needs to be delayed, as both processes are interdependent.

This is an urgent appeal to the WHO and its Member States to safeguard the rule of law and procedural and outcome equity by allowing fair input and deliberation. To do so, it will require lifting and extending the deadline, thus rendering the possibility for a more future-proof legal architecture for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response in-line with international law and its normative commitments.

Respectfully yours.

i UNTS Vol 2509, p.79, <a href="https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002801d31cc&clang=_en">https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002801d31cc&clang=_en</a>
ii In accordance with Rule 41 of the Rules of Procedure of the Health Assembly.
iii <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XvavE-p6VA">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XvavE-p6VA</a>
iv <a href="https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/international-health-regulations/terms-of-reference_ihr- amendments-rc_for-web_rev-221024.pdf">https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/international-health-regulations/terms-of-reference_ihr-
amendments-rc_for-web_rev-221024.pdf</a>, para.6
v In accordance with Arts. 59, 61 and 62 IHR as well as Art. 22 of the WHO’s Constitution.
vi <a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/downloads/download/228/rational-policy-over-panic">https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/downloads/download/228/rational-policy-over-panic</a>
vii <a href="https://digitallibrary.un.org/nanna/record/265687/files/A_RES_53_101- EN.pdf?withWatermark=0&withMetadata=0&version=1&registerDownload=1">https://digitallibrary.un.org/nanna/record/265687/files/A_RES_53_101-
EN.pdf?withWatermark=0&withMetadata=0&version=1&registerDownload=1</a>

You can add formatting using markdown syntax - read more

Add me to your mailing list

Hide name from public

Imzolovchilar roʻyxati bilan xat ostida tanishish mumkin. Ayni paytda siz tasdiqlovchi xat olmaysiz. Agar obunani bekor qilmoqchi bo’lsangiz, info@openletter-who.com manziliga elektron pochta xabarini yuboring.

OCHIQ XAT

Jahon sog’liqni saqlash tashkiloti va muzokaralar olib borayotgan barcha a’zo davlatlarga,
Xalqaro sog’liqni saqlash qoidalariga o’zgartirishlar kiritish bo’yicha ishchi guruhi
va Xalqaro muzokaralar organi

2024 yil aprel

Hurmatli doktor Tedros, Jahon sog’liqni saqlash tashkiloti Bosh direktori
Hurmatli WGIHR hamraislari doktor Asiri va doktor Blumfild,
Hurmatli INB hamraislari doktor Matsoso va janob Dris,
Hurmatli tegishli ishchi guruhlarining milliy delegatlari!

Xalqaro sog’liqni saqlash qoidalariga (2005) o’zgartirishlar kiritish bo’yicha ishchi guruhi (WGIHR) va Pandemiya kelishuvi bo’yicha muzokaralar olib borayotgan Xalqaro muzokaralar organi (INB) Xalqaro sog’liqni saqlash qoidalariga (IHR) maqsadli tuzatishlarning aniq huquqiy matnini taqdim etishlari kerak edi. shuningdek, 2024 yil may oyi oxirida bo’lib o’tadigan 77-Jahon sog’liqni saqlash assambleyasining (WSA) Pandemiya kelishuvi. Ushbu jarayonlar qisqa va o’rta muddatda yana bir pandemiya yuzaga kelishi xavfi cheklanganligi haqidagi dalillarga qaramay, «COVID-19dan keyingi lahzani qo’lga kiritish» uchun shoshilinch ravishda amalga oshirildi. Boshqacha qilib aytganda, bu choralarni to’g’ri qabul qilish uchun vaqt bor.

Shunga qaramay, ushbu jarayonlarning tezligi tufayli ikkala muzokara jarayoni ham JSST homiyligida pandemiya qonunlarini ishlab chiqish jarayoni orqali himoyalanishi e’lon qilingan adolat va muzokaralarning maqsad va tamoyillarini buzgan holda noqonuniy siyosat olib borish bilan tahdid qilmoqda. . Binobarin, 77-JSSTda siyosiy jihatdan belgilangan qabul qilish muddati olib tashlanishi va jarayonlarning qonuniyligi va shaffofligini ta’minlash, o’zgartirilgan IHR va yangi Pandemiya kelishuvi o’rtasidagi munosabatlarni aniqlashtirish va adolatli va demokratik natijani ta’minlash uchun uzaytirilishi kerak.

WGIHRning IHRga rioya qilmasligi 77-JSSTda qonuniy farzand asrab olishni istisno qiladi.

77-JSSTda IHRga har qanday tuzatishlar qabul qilinishiga endi qonuniy yo’l bilan erishib bo’lmaydi. Hozirgi vaqtda WGIHR 22-26 aprel kunlari bo’lib o’tadigan 8-yig’ilishida taklif qilingan tuzatishlar paketini yakunlash maqsadida o’zgartirishlar loyihasi bo’yicha muzokaralarni davom ettirmoqda, keyin esa 77-JSSTga taqdim etiladi. Ushbu ish tartibi noqonuniy hisoblanadi. Bu IHRga o‘zgartirishlar kiritish tartibini belgilab beruvchi 55(2) moddasini buzadi:

“Taklif qilinayotgan har qanday tuzatish matni Bosh direktor tomonidan barcha ishtirokchi-davlatlarga u koʻrib chiqish uchun taklif qilingan Sogʻliqni saqlash assambleyasidan kamida toʻrt oy oldin yuboriladi”.

Bosh direktor tomonidan IHRga taklif qilingan tuzatishlar paketini 77-JSSTdan oldin ishtirokchi-davlatlarga qonuniy ravishda yuborish muddati 2024-yil 27-yanvarda o‘tdi.

Hozircha Bosh direktor shtatlarga hech qanday tuzatishlar haqida xabar bermagan. IHR har ikki davlatni majburiy bo’lgan ko’p tomonlama shartnoma bo’lib, IHR va JSSTni, shu jumladan WGIHR kabi JSST bo’linmalarini (1) ratifikatsiya qilgan. Ular IHR 55 (2)-moddasining majburiy protsessual qoidalariga rioya qilishlari kerak va bu qoidalarni o’zboshimchalik bilan to’xtatib turolmaydilar.

2023-yil 2-oktabrdagi ommaviy veb-translyatsiya paytida bu masala JSSTning Bosh yuridik xodimi doktor Stiven Solomonga havola qilindi, u tushuntirdiki, tuzatishlar loyihasi JSST bo‘linmasidan kelganligi sababli, 55(2)-moddaning 4 oylik talabi bajarildi. qo’llanilmaydi. Biroq, uning fikri 55-moddaning 2-bandida qaysi davlat, davlatlar guruhi yoki JSSTning ma’lum bir qismi o’zgartirishlar kiritishni taklif qilayotgani haqida hech qanday farq qilmasligini e’tiborga olmaydi. Bundan tashqari, texnik topshiriqda (6-band) IHR Ko’rib chiqish qo’mitasining (2022) WGIHR ish vaqti 2024 yil yanvarida belgilandi: WGIHR taklif qilingan tuzatishlarning yakuniy paketini Bosh direktorga taqdim etadi, u ularni barcha ishtirokchi-davlatlarga etkazadi. 55(2)-modda Yetmish yettinchi Jahon sog’liqni saqlash assambleyasi ko’rib chiqish uchun.’ Agar WGIHR va JSST IHRni ataylab buzsa, qonun ustuvorligi haqiqatan ham buziladi, bu tashkilot va/yoki mas’ul shaxslar uchun xalqaro javobgarlikni keltirib chiqarishi mumkin.

IHR va yangi Pandemiya shartnomasining ajralmas jarayonlari

WGIHR va INB ning mavjud loyihalari WGIHR va INB ning ikkita jarayoni mustaqil turolmasligini, lekin bir-biridan ajralmas ekanligini anglatadi. Xususan, yangi Pandemiya to‘g‘risidagi bitim loyihasi IHRni qayta ko‘rib chiqishdan oldin qabul qilinishi mumkin emas, chunki u IHRning qayta ko‘rib chiqilgan tuzilmasi, moddiy miqyosi va institutlariga asoslanishi kerak (ayniqsa, hozirgi vaqtda 2024-yil 7-martdagi muzokaralar matnida IHRning asosiy imkoniyatlarining matni berilgan) Pandemiya kelishuvi). Materiyalarning muhim o’xshashligi, yangi tashkil etilgan shartnoma organlari va a’zo davlatlar o’rtasidagi vakolatlar va munosabatlar, shuningdek, sog’liqni saqlash byudjeti uchun uzoq muddatli moliyaviy oqibatlar va boshqalar kabi muammolarni buzish. – qabul qilishdan oldin batafsil tushuntirishni talab qilish.

Tenglik va demokratik qonuniylik

IHR bo’yicha protsessual majburiyatlarni e’tiborsiz qoldirish va o’zgartirilgan IHR va yangi Pandemiya kelishuvi o’rtasidagi munosabatlarni noaniq qoldirish nafaqat xalqaro huquq ustuvorligiga putur etkazadi, balki A’zo davlatlarni kafolatlaydigan IHR (2005) 55 (2) moddasi ruhini ham buzadi. demokratik qonuniylikni, protsessual adolatni targ’ib qilish va adolatli natijalarni yaxshiroq ta’minlash uchun IHR tuzatishlarini ko’rib chiqish uchun to’rt oylik muddat.

Davlatlarga taklif etilayotgan o’zgartirishlarning o’zlarining ichki konstitutsiyaviy huquqiy tuzumlari va moliyaviy imkoniyatlariga ta’sirini chuqur o’ylab ko’rishlari uchun kamida to’rt oy kerak bo’ladi. JSSTda tegishli rezolyutsiyalarni qabul qilishdan oldin ular siyosiy va/yoki parlament roziligini olishlari kerak. Bu, ayniqsa, agar ishtirokchi-davlat 10 oy (2) ichida juda qisqa vaqt ichida faol ravishda voz kechmasa, avtomatik ravishda kuchga kiradigan qabul qilingan IHR tuzatishlarining o’ziga xos huquqiy maqomini hisobga olgan holda juda muhim.

JSST tomonidan ta’kidlanganidek, tenglik pandemiyaga tayyorgarlik ko’rish va unga javob berish kun tartibining markazidir. Ko’pgina past va o’rta daromadli mamlakatlarda Jenevada barcha parallel muzokaralar jarayonida vakillar va ekspertlar mavjud emas, ularning vakillari masalalarni kamroq tanish tillarda muhokama qiladilar va/yoki diplomatik guruh/mintaqaviy vakolatxonalarga tayanishi kerak. Bu WGIHR va Pandemiya kelishuvini ishlab chiquvchi INB doirasidagi muzokaralar jarayonida to’liq ishtirok etish qobiliyatiga tengsizlikni keltirib chiqaradi. Boyroq mamlakatlar loyihalarga kiritish imkoniyati va ularning oqibatlarini ko’rib chiqish uchun ko’proq resurslarga ega. Bu ochiq-oydin adolatsiz muzokara jarayonlari butun jarayonning ruhi va bayon qilingan maqsadiga ziddir. Adolat, oshkoralik va adolatni ta’minlash qonuniy kuchga ega bo’lgan shartnomalarni muhokama qilish va ko’rib chiqish uchun etarli vaqtni talab qiladi.

Aniq darajada bo’rttirilgan shoshilinch da’vo

Ba’zilar pandemiyaga qarshi kurashning yangi vositalarini ishlab chiqishning shoshilinchligi bunday yuqumli kasalliklarning avj olish xavfi va yuki ortib borayotgani bilan oqlanadi, deb ta’kidlagan bo’lsa-da, bu yaqinda sezilarli darajada bo’rttirilgan da’vo ekanligi isbotlandi. JSST tayangan dalillar asoslari va hamkor agentliklar, shu jumladan Jahon banki va G20, tabiiy kelib chiqadigan epidemiyalar xavfi hozirda ortib borayotgani yo’q va umumiy yuk, ehtimol, pasaymoqda. Bu shuni ko’rsatadiki, amaldagi mexanizmlar haqiqatan ham nisbatan samarali ishlaydi va o’zgarishlar JSSTga a’zo davlatlarda tahdidning heterojenligi va raqobatdosh sog’liqni saqlash ustuvorliklari nuqtai nazaridan ehtiyotkorlik bilan, ortiqcha shoshilinch holda ko’rib chiqilishi kerak.

77-JSSTda IHR tuzatishlari yoki Pandemiya kelishuvini qabul qilmaslik uchun shikoyat qilish

Ikki ishchi guruhdan BMT tamoyillari va xalqaro muzokaralar boʻyicha yoʻriqnomalariga amal qilishlari soʻraladi, UN A/RES/53/101, va muzokaralarni yaxshi niyat ruhida olib borish va “muzokaralar davomida konstruktiv muhitni saqlashga va muzokaralar va ularning rivojlanishiga putur yetkazadigan har qanday xatti-harakatlardan tiyilish”. Natijalar uchun siyosiy bosimsiz oqilona vaqt jadvali joriy qonun ijodkorligi jarayonini qulashdan himoya qiladi va potentsial siyosiy voz kechishning oldini oladi, JSSTning tadqiqot va ishlanmalar (R&D) shartnomasi misolida.

IHRga (2005) o’zgartirishlar kiritish jarayonini boshlashning asl sabablaridan biri JSSTning xalqaro tashvishga sabab bo’lgan Covid-19 sog’liqni saqlash sohasidagi favqulodda vaziyatlarda davlatlar IHR bo’yicha o’z majburiyatlariga rioya qilmayotganidan ochiq tashvishi edi. 4 oylik ko’rib chiqish muddatiga rioya qilmasliklari bilan JSST va WGIHR o’zlari IHR bo’yicha qonuniy majburiy bo’lgan majburiyatlariga ochiqchasiga e’tibor bermasliklarini ko’rsatmoqdalar. 77-JSSTda qabul qilish uchun IHRga taklif qilingan tuzatishlar bilan rezolyutsiya endi qonuniy ravishda taqdim etilishi mumkin emas. Binobarin, Pandemiya kelishuvini ham kechiktirish kerak, chunki ikkala jarayon ham bir-biriga bog’liq.

Bu JSST va unga a’zo davlatlarga adolatli fikr-mulohazalar va mulohaza yuritish orqali qonun ustuvorligini, protsessual va natijaviy adolatni ta’minlash uchun shoshilinch murojaatdir. Buning uchun bu muddatni ko’tarish va uzaytirishni talab qiladi, bu esa xalqaro huquq va uning me’yoriy majburiyatlariga muvofiq pandemiyaning oldini olish, tayyorgarlik ko’rish va javob berish uchun yanada ishonchli huquqiy arxitekturani yaratish imkoniyatini beradi.

Hurmat bilan.

1 Sog’liqni saqlash assambleyasi reglamentining 41-qoidasiga muvofiq.
2-moddaga muvofiq. 59, 61 va 62 IHR, shuningdek, Art. JSST Konstitutsiyasining 22-moddasi.

Openletter WHO - PLEASE SIGN THIS OPEN LETTER

Dear SpeakOut! user

April 2024

– 26th April that is then to be presented to the 77th WHA. This modus operandi is unlawful. It violates Article 55(2) IHR which sets out the procedure to be followed for amending the IHR:

The deadline for the Director-General to circulate the package of proposed amendments to the IHR to States Parties lawfully in advance of the 77th WHA has passed on the 27th January 2024.

Inseparable processes of IHR and new Pandemic Treaty

Equity and democratic legitimacy

Markedly exaggerated urgency claim

Appeal not to adopt the IHR amendments or Pandemic Agreement at the 77th WHA

Respectfully yours.

You can add formatting using markdown syntax - read more

Add me to your mailing list

Hide name from public

14454

Ayni paytda siz tasdiqlovchi xat olmaysiz. Agar obunani bekor qilmoqchi bo’lsangiz, info@openletter-who.com manziliga elektron pochta xabarini yuboring.

Latest Signatures

14,454

Mr. Lindsey Crawley Junior

Brazil

May 16, 2024

14,453

Ms. Scarlett Pearson

Canada

May 16, 2024

14,452

Anonymous

Belgium

May 16, 2024

14,451

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 16, 2024

14,450

Anonymous

United Kingdom

May 16, 2024

14,449

Mr. Ian Bale

United Kingdom

May 16, 2024

14,448

Anonymous

United Kingdom

May 16, 2024

14,447

Ms. Eva Samaniego

Spain

May 16, 2024

14,446

Anonymous

Belgium

May 16, 2024

14,445

Ms. Susanne Diez

Austria

May 16, 2024

14,444

Anonymous

Netherlands

May 16, 2024

14,443

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 16, 2024

14,442

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 16, 2024

14,441

Anonymous

Netherlands

May 16, 2024

14,440

Ms. Hanna Finborud

Norway

May 16, 2024

14,439

Ms. Melinda Merunada

Norway

May 16, 2024

14,438

Anonymous

France

May 16, 2024

14,437

Anonymous

Norway

May 16, 2024

14,436

Mr. Franz Swoboda

Austria

May 16, 2024

14,435

Mrs. Imbi Siirmann

Estonia

May 16, 2024

14,434

Mrs. Ylle Margumets

Estonia

May 16, 2024

14,433

Mr. Chris Picard

Canada

May 16, 2024

14,432

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 16, 2024

14,431

Anonymous

Australia

May 16, 2024

14,430

Miss. Rus Majda

Slovenia

May 16, 2024

14,429

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 16, 2024

14,428

Ms. Sofia Sandström

Sweden

May 15, 2024

14,427

Ms. Monica Carlsson

Sweden

May 15, 2024

14,426

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,425

Anonymous

Netherlands

May 15, 2024

14,424

Ms. Bogdan Rojc

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,423

Anonymous

Netherlands

May 15, 2024

14,422

Mr. Wolfgang Leitner

Switzerland

May 15, 2024

14,421

Anonymous

Switzerland

May 15, 2024

14,420

Mr. Vogl Marc

Canada

May 15, 2024

14,419

Ms. King Shelley

Canada

May 15, 2024

14,418

Mrs. Cvetka Popotnik Pršo

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,417

Anonymous

United States

May 15, 2024

14,416

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,415

Anonymous

Finland

May 15, 2024

14,414

Ms. anton repnik

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,413

Mr. Ari Parikka

Finland

May 15, 2024

14,412

Dr. Sabina Jurič Šenk

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,411

Mr. Anton Petek

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,410

Anonymous

Romania

May 15, 2024

14,409

Mr. Virgil Manole

Romania

May 15, 2024

14,408

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,407

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,406

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

14,405

Anonymous

Slovenia

May 15, 2024

<< < > >>

ILTIMOS BO’LING!XATNI OCHISHJAHON SOG‘LIQNI SAQLASH TASHKILOTI

2024-yil, aprel

OCHIQ XATNI O‘QING VA IMZO BO‘LINGSIZ UCHUN MUHIM VA ZO’HR!O’QING NEGA:

Openletter WHO - PLEASE SIGN THIS OPEN LETTER

OCHIQ XAT

WGIHRning IHRga rioya qilmasligi 77-JSSTda qonuniy farzand asrab olishni istisno qiladi.

IHR va yangi Pandemiya shartnomasining ajralmas jarayonlari

Tenglik va demokratik qonuniylik

Aniq darajada bo’rttirilgan shoshilinch da’vo

77-JSSTda IHR tuzatishlari yoki Pandemiya kelishuvini qabul qilmaslik uchun shikoyat qilish

Openletter WHO - PLEASE SIGN THIS OPEN LETTER

ILTIMOS BO’LING!

XATNI OCHISH
JAHON SOG‘LIQNI SAQLASH TASHKILOTI

OCHIQ XATNI O‘QING VA IMZO BO‘LING
SIZ UCHUN MUHIM VA ZO’HR!
O’QING NEGA: